Cited by 39Interdisciplinary Research and CollaborationConservation, Ecology, Wildlife EducationEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overcoming Specialization

KOSTOFF, RONALD N.·2002·BioScience

Abstract

Many of the most challenging problems in bioscience require advances in a multitude of technical and nontechnical disciplines for progress to be made. Biodiversity, biocomplexity, biotechnology, species and ecosystem conservation, and bioterrorism require expertise from myriad technical, legal, political, financial, and cultural disciplines. For example, environmental biocomplexity is founded on the idea that research on the individual components of environmental systems provides only limited information about the behavior of the systems themselves. Careful attention to the interplay among components is critical to obtaining the level of predictive information on which management and regulatory decisions must be made. To understand the complex interdependencies among living organisms and the environments that affect, sustain, and are modified by them, efforts that transcend multiple disciplines are required. Such efforts span temporal and spatial scales, consider multiple levels of biological organization, cross conceptual boundaries, use contemporary technologies, and link research to environmental decisionmaking. Advancing the understanding of the nature and role of biological complexity demands increased attention from and new collaborations of scientists from a broad spectrum of fields—biology, physics, chemistry, geology, hydrology, statistics, engineering, computation, and social sciences. In addition, advances in large-scale applications of remote sensors to monitor environmental biosystems require access to the latest science and engineering literature in remote sensing, nondestructive evaluation, signal and image processing, pattern recognition, multisource data fusion, fluid dynamics, acoustics, robotics, materials, electronics, and many other disciplines.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0937:os]2.0.co;2

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Butler, 1998, Nature, 396, 202

Metadata

Authors
KOSTOFF, R. N.
Corresponding author
KOSTOFF, RONALD N.
Venue
BioScience
Published
2002
Volume
52
Issue
10
Pages
937
ISSN
0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4253847788
Cited by
39
References
15
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BioScience (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
interdisciplinary research, scientific specialization, biodiversity, biotechnology, bioterrorism, environmental decision-making, remote sensing, multi-source data fusion, systems biology, research collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overcoming Specialization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052%5B0937:os%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
KOSTOFF, R. N. (2002). Overcoming Specialization. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052%5B0937%3Aos%5D2.0.co%3B2